Joe Biden slips into the red as the economy and independents threaten him

Make sense of what matters most in Washington. |

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

By Philip Elliott Washington Correspondent, TIME Afghanistan is Imploding, But the Bigger Political Risk to Joe Biden May Be the Economy Unless you’re a die-hard political science nerd, the date of Aug. 16 probably means nothing to you. I know that I missed it as Kabul fell, Americans struggled to get fellow citizens and allies in the 20 years of war in Afghanistan out of the country and the Dow here at home dropped by almost 1 percentage point in one day of trading on Wall Street. But on that day, by a margin of 0.1%, President Joe Biden’s job approval number, for the first time as President, dropped below 50% in the FiveThirtyEight poll of polls. In other words, it was the first crack in what had to that point suggested Biden had the support of at least half of the country he was leading. And it’s one of those moments when any leader expecting to slide into re-elect mode as early as November of next year starts to get worried. On its own, the polling slip was—and remains—inconsequential. But it does speak to a humming concern among some Democrats that Biden’s popularity isn’t absolute. The very narrow dip suggests that a break from the Donald Trump-era bombast was welcome for many Americans, but may be insufficient to guarantee a re-election. The economy is on pace to have its strongest calendar-year showing since 1984. But voters don’t believe it: An AP poll from June found 54% of Americans think the economy is in poor shape. If that economic reality isn’t matched with voters’ perceptions, it could leave Democrats in control of the White House, the House and the Senate while holding a rich but rancid bag. The quick collapse of Afghanistan, coming so close to the 20th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, hasn’t helped Biden’s standing. New polling from USA Today, released just Tuesday, found three-quarters of Americans expect Afghanistan to once again become a safe haven for those who would launch terror attacks against the United States. The bombing outside Hamid Karzai International Airport’s Abbey Gate today will do nothing to counter those persistent fears that two decades of Americans’ work in that country have been for naught. But if you dig a little deeper and a little closer to home, it’s less the implosion half a world away and more the worries around the corner in Americans’ own neighborhoods that are hurting Biden. In particular, independent voters—those who align with neither party—are skittish. In April, 61% of indies approved of Biden’s job performance, according to NBC News’ polling . That figure now stands at 46%. His handling of COVID-19 during that same period among the same independent voters collapsed from 81% to 52%. And his handling of the economy fell from 60% to 45%. Without independents, Biden couldn’t have won in 2020. That bloc, which accounted for 26% of the vote, broke for Biden last year by a 13-point margin. If the electorate next year looks like it did in 2018, the last midterm vote, independents will account for an even larger chunk. Three years ago, as Democrats took control of the House, indies were 30% of the electorate and broke to Team Blue by 12 points. Democrats at the moment have a razor-thin eight-seat advantage in the House, an upper hand that disappears in an instant if redistricting goes as many Democrats expect. In fact, gerrymandering four Southern states alone could hand Republicans the gavel again in the House. The Senate is split evenly at 50-50, with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the tie in Democrats' favor. History isn’t on Team Blue’s side. In fact, the party that controls the White House typically takes a slagging in its first at-bat under a new President. Democrats picked up a net 41 House seats during Trump’s one midterm test. Republicans picked up 63 seats in Barack Obama’s first electoral report card, and 54 during Bill Clinton’s. (The one notable outlier was 2002, when George W. Bush’s post-9/11 polling glow had even the most partisan Democrats biting their tongue and waving Old Glory. Republicans in that year picked up eight House seats.) That’s why the White House is so eager to land the ongoing talks about a net $4 trillion in new infrastructure spending. An accord among feuding Democratic factions seems to have been reached this week with some procedural votes that set up a fall passage of twin infrastructure bills. The White House plans to sell them hard. But they also need to be very careful in how they pitch the spending: pumping that much cash into an economy could feed real and perceived fears of inflation . Both impressions about the state of the economy can be true . While college-educated workers have been able to make the transition to working from home, less-educated workers have seen their jobs in sectors like services and hospitality evaporate. The disappearance of some 8 million jobs during the pandemic has disproportionately hit racial minorities, new college grads and women, especially single mothers who have returned to home to provide childcare. Layer the political coalitions of both parties over this landscape and it’s immediately clear why Democrats have a looming crisis unless they can convince their allies that the recovery has been equitable. First, though, the need to buoy their party’s leader into personal recovery mode. After all, FiveThirtyEight’s meta-poll has him with less than 1 percentage point to spare before he becomes more unpopular than popular. A quick note: this newsletter will be on hiatus next week and—barring breaking news—will return on Wednesday, Sept. 8.   Share this newsletter

Here's what else we're watching in Washington Kabul's Collapse Sends a Rush to K Street Every crisis presents an opportunity for someone, and those high-dollar upsides are arriving on K Street’s lobbying corridor. As Politico sagely observes in one headline: “​​Afghanistan’s a sh--show. But for K Street, it’s an opportunity.” Read More » How Mexico Helped American Newsrooms Evacuate Their Afghan Staff A personal relationship between a New York Times journalist and the Mexican foreign minister helped secure offers of safe passage for dozens of Afghan fixers from that newsroom, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post to get out of Kabul and onward to Mexico City. As detailed in The New York Times, it is merely the latest example of personal relationships cutting through thick red tape to create new paths to safety. Read More » That's The Good News. Now For The Bad An estimated quarter-of-a-million Afghans who helped the U.S. over the last 20 years are still stuck in Afghanistan, The New York Times reports. Even if the United States can keep the pace of 20,000 evacuations a day, there’s mathematically no way to get all of the eligible refugees out of the country. Read More » Two Weeks Later, Aid Gets To Haiti A massive, magnitude 7.2 earthquake destroyed 50,000 homes. Finally, 11 days later, aid—albeit insufficient aid—is finally getting to Haitians, the poorest people in this hemisphere, NPR reports. Read More » D.C. Judges Say Enough At hearings related to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, typically staid judges are struggling to contain their disbelief that defendants still don’t get what they did was wrong even as they plead guilty and pledge cooperation with what is the largest federal investigation in history. As The Washington Post reports, that incredulity may come with consequences when it comes time for sentencing. Read More »

Want more from TIME? Sign up for our other newsletters. Subscribe to TIME

TIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services in this email. Offers may be subject to change without notice.   Connect with TIME via Facebook | Twitter | Newsletters   UPDATE EMAIL     UNSUBSCRIBE    PRIVACY POLICY   YOUR CALIFORNIA PRIVACY RIGHTS   TIME Customer Service, P.O. Box 37508, Boone, IA 50037-0508   Questions? Contact politics@time.com   Copyright © 2021 TIME USA, LLC. All rights reserved.